Does the conclusion leave you with something significant or does it seem too abrupt or undeveloped?
This is the question I think is most important. I picked this question because I think that a lot of the time the conclusion is overlooked. People tend to get lazy toward the end. I think the conclusion is just as important as the introduction. In any paper you want the conclusion to leave you with something significant, such as a lesson. If your conclusion doesn't have a lesson or ends with no explanation it leaves the reader confused. Those are the reasons that I picked this question. The conclusion if like the finishing touch on a painting. It can make or break it.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment